On 18 November 2016, the Flag Institute Council, meeting in Birmingham, formally adopted a new flag and emblem.
Their predecessors were designed in 1971 by the late Dr William Crampton, founder and former Director of the Flag Institute.
His design incorporated a St George’s cross, representng the Institute’s founding date (23 April 1971 – St George’s Day), as well as a stylised ‘V’ evoking vexillology.
Over the decades, however, the Flag Institute has grown and developed a UK- and worldwide remit, and we needed to a new flag and logo to reflect this.
The design – created by Chief Vexillologist Graham Bartram, and Communities Vexillologist Philip Tibbetts – is a stylised representation of the lower quarter of the Union Flag, expressing vexillology moving forward.
You’ll see the new logo in use on this website but during the transition period some publications might bear the old emblem until stocks are exhausted.
Oh dear! It looks all wrong! Should have used the fourth quarter and not the third!
I have already turned down a design like this on the advice by a senior F I member
What is preferrable about the fourth quarter?
It seems the intention here was to have also a red arrow pointing to the upper right (or upper left if seen from the other side of the flag, I suppose; upper flyward, perhaps?) to signify “forward movement” (in the sense of progress).
Did anyone actually complain about this? If they’re going to object to the St George’s Cross being prominent the Flag Institute’s emblem, they’re going to object to it being prominent in the Union Flag itself.
The way it’s used in the old emblem/flag is more of a nordic cross anyway.
The new emblem’s ok as a logo, but it won’t work as a flag if it’s stylised like that. I’m sure you’re all aware of the guidelines for good flag design (e.g. simple geometric shapes, easy to draw from memory).
Please keep the old flag, at least as an official symbol if not as the Institute’s logo!
I think the old flag is a great design; It’s unique, is already reminiscent of the Union Flag in terms of colours and shapes, and has a story behind it.
Gentlemen, I was not a supporter of the need to change the Institute’s emblem and flag, however, if it was to change then I was hoping for something innovative. Whilst I am a stanch supporter of the Union Flag, I regret to say you have not met my vexillological expectations.
It now looks more emblematic of Britain than of flags. Much like the BNP, NF logos
Being a firm believer of “if it is not broken, don’t fix it” I must say that I always admired the flag design of Dr. William Crampton. It’s a clean design and instantly recognizable at a distance, displaying all the requirements of a good flag design. I don’t feel like the “new improved” design does any of those things, and like many of the new generation of artistic flag designs it is another abstract attempt at to improve something that didn’t need improvement. Like the people of New Zealand recently loudly proclaimed, don’t mess with tradition. By-the-way, was there any vote or polling of the whole membership on this “improvement?” I’d be curious about the results.
I realize some of the comments discrediting the newly designed emblem are mostly the very experienced and senior vexillologist, vexillographer, vexillophile or experts in heraldic matters. In that, they are mostly familiar with the pedigree and laid traditions in regard to this Honourable fields. Well, its the spirit rather than the law that matters. The new emblem is very progressive to say the least, and it shall sere a whole different generation of audience and hence appears to embrace a rather simplified value as it courageously points to the future beyond what we are used to…..and I like the institutes new found attitude.
Bravo!!!